HackerTube.dev

Dan Abramov The wet codebase

eswarnichtsmehrfrei · 26.6K views · 2021-03-14 · 25:01

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Dan Abramov's talk on the wet codebase, using visualizations to show how removing all duplication too early produces wrong abstractions that are hard to unwind.

On Hacker News

Recommended in DRY versus duplication debates for its visuals and its case that copy/paste can beat a wrong abstraction.

Recommended by 3 HN people across 3 months · HN mentions 2023–2024

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

halfcat · 2024-05 · Strong recommendation

The visualizations in Dan Abramov’s talk “The wet codebase” [1] really burned this concept in for me. Seeing what a premature, wrong abstraction looks like visually was eye opening. [1] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
halfcat · 2024-08 · Recommendation

Dan Abramov talks about WET (write everything twice) [1] as generally a good approach, primarily because you often don’t know the right abstraction up front, and a wrong abstraction is way worse than a copy/paste. He has some good visuals that illustrate how incorrectly dependent and impossible to unwind wrong abstractions can become. [1] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
shadowfoxx · 2023-08 · Recommendation

In my career as a software dev I've found one thing to be true - Every Paradigm I ingest that opens new windows of opportunity are great at first pass and as I learn more the more narrow the scope they can be applied. (This is kinda true in life, too. Like when people say, "Its econ 101 or bio 101." etc. What seems like a statement about 'common' knowledge is actually an indication of how shallow your knowledge is!) Specifically related to this topic is a talk by Dan Abramov called, "The Wet Codebase" - He says it better than I can sum up and has visual aids : [VIDEO] Other have pointed out code that is similar in function vs similar by coincidence and I think that thought alone is worth chewing on.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by eswarnichtsmehrfrei, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources