HackerTube.dev

We Solved Nuclear Waste Decades Ago

Kyle Hill · 4.5M views · 2022-03-27 · 18:14

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Kyle Hill explains what nuclear waste actually is and how it is stored, arguing that the problem was effectively solved decades ago. It covers solid shielded waste and deep geological storage.

On Hacker News

Cited in nuclear power debates to argue that waste storage is a political rather than technical problem.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2022–2022

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

slenk · 2022-07 · Recommendation

Nuclear waste, as far as I have been learning, is pretty "safe". Yeah, you need a place to deal with it, but it's mostly highly shielded solids. A video I watched recently explaining a lot: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
devoutsalsa · 2022-06 · Recommendation

Nuclear waste isn't a problem if you drill a hole that's deep enough, encase the waste in a "dry cask", and drop it in the hole. Kyle Hill did a great video on this... "We solved nuclear waste decades ago" => [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
slavik81 · 2022-09 · Reference

We Solved Nuclear Waste Decades Ago - [VIDEO] The safe long-term storage of nuclear waste is not a technical problem. It's a political problem. The public opposes even just doing research into safer storage methods for nuclear waste. In 2016, the Department of Energy test wells for deep borehole disposal were cancelled due to protests. The tests were not even going to involve nuclear material! The opposition feared that the tests might show that the area was geologically appropriate for the safe storage of nuclear waste.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Kyle Hill, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources