EEVblog #1001 - uBeam Ultrasonic Wireless Charging DEBUNKED!

EEVblog · 133.5K views · 2017-06-23 · 15:25

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Dave Jones of EEVblog debunks the uBeam ultrasonic wireless phone charging technology and explains why it is not practical. He covers efficiency, coupling loss and safety, and responds to the founder's remarks about engineers.

On Hacker News

Cited as the definitive engineering takedown of uBeam and as a cautionary example of hype-driven startups.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2017–2020

Topics

Electronics & circuit design Consumer devices & gadgets Startups & entrepreneurship

What people said

namibj · 2020-06 · Reference
Dave Jones from EEVBlog made a debunking video on uBeam. They apparently tried to to do ultrasonic wireless charging, which seems to fit your description. Here's the video, it's mostly about efficiency/coupling loss (beam forming has it's limits) and IIRC also about being potentially harmful for humans: [VIDEO]
Read the original HN comment ↗

neotek · 2018-10 · Criticism
Clever move, get out before the indictments land when investors figure out they've been had. uBeam's been completely full of shit from day one, and Perry is every bit as deceptive and deluded as Theranos' Elizabeth Holmes. Dave from EEVBlog has a couple of great videos about the uBeam scam, they're well worth watching: [VIDEO] [LINK]
Read the original HN comment ↗

gh02t · 2017-07 · Criticism
Here's Dave Jones ripping into it pretty hard. [VIDEO] The talk by the uBeam CEO he links is also pretty infuriating. [LINK] Her core hypothesis that experts can often get stuck "inside the box" is certainly valid, but on the other hand "I sat down and solved complex engineering problems in a few minutes with pencil and paper" (almost an exact quote from the talk) is just plain dumb. Not to mention the not subtle implication that good engineers are all socially retarded...
Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by EEVblog, played through YouTube.

HN Library · Source license

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks

SaaS & AI candidates: Matches the configured criteria
Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources