HackerTube.dev

Wireless vs wired DC fast charging efficiency test

Bjørn Nyland · 66.9K views · 2022-03-18 · 25:40

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Bjorn Nyland compares wireless and wired DC fast charging for an electric car, measuring end-to-end efficiency. The test shows the wireless system holding up well against a plug.

On Hacker News

HN cites it as the evidence that inductive EV charging can match wired charging in efficiency.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2022–2025

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

audunw · 2024-08 · Recommendation

Wireless charging can be surprisingly efficient. You should check out this video where wireless charging beats wired charging in end to end efficiency: [VIDEO] In that case it’s probably more due to a particularly inefficient DC fast charger. (It’s been a long time since I watched it so I might not remember the details right.) In the end it doesn’t have to be exactly as efficient as wired charging, and probably never will be for a good implementation of a wired charger. It only has to be so close that you don’t care about the difference. I don’t think the inverse square law is very relevant on these scales. Electromagnetic radiation can be focused.

Read the original HN comment ↗
breve · 2025-09 · Reference

> There's zero chance this will make it into a production vehicle Wireless charging is in production. Here's one example: [LINK] Wireless charging can be as efficient as wired charging: [VIDEO] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
clouddrover · 2023-11 · Reference

> If there only was a system that could automatically disconnect Or just use wireless charging, then there are no cables. Wireless charging for EVs can be efficient: [VIDEO] And wired charging is not as efficient as you might think: [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Bjørn Nyland, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources