HackerTube.dev

Mill Ave at Night

Brian Kaufman · 185K views · 2018-03-22 · 0:43

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A one-minute night drive along Mill Ave in Tempe, Arizona, filmed to show that the crash site looked much brighter than Uber's released dashcam video suggested. It was made in response to the fatal 2018 Uber self-driving crash.

On Hacker News

Used as evidence that Uber's dashcam footage misrepresented how well lit the road was.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2018–2020

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

pja · 2020-02 · Reference

The video released by Uber was extremely misleading. Here is a video on YouTube of the same stretch of road taken by someone with an ordinary phone camera shortly after Elaine’s death: [VIDEO] It’s clear that a) the road is well lit and b) visibility is far, far better than the Uber video would suggest. An ordinary human driver would have seen Elaine & taken evasive action. This death is absolutely Uber’s responsibility.

Read the original HN comment ↗
rtkwe · 2018-04 · Reference

It seems like the dash cam video released is very misleading there's been a couple people who've driven through the same area at night and it is well lit. [0] From the Uber cam it seems like the light is still on because there's a bright glow about where streetlights are in the other videos. It's kind of shocking just how bad the dash cam of the incident actually is unless the lights were recently (because there's still the glow) off for some reason before dawn (poorly implemented scheduling maybe?). The difference between the Uber dash cam [1] and the one posted to youtube is stark [2]. It's certainly darker where she comes from but no where near impossible. Source the ArsTechnica article [3] [0] [VIDEO] [1] [LINK] [2] [LINK] [3] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
jadedhacker · 2018-03 · Reference

These facts are only relevant if you disregard LIDAR and you believe that the camera showed what the human eye would see. Videos on youtube ( [VIDEO] and also [LINK] ) and ABC news footage ( [LINK] ) at the scene of the crash paint a much brighter picture. The street lights in the footage appear to be distinct while the background is dark, indicating the gain of the sensor would appear to be reduced. Try taking a picture of streetlights at night, if the street is visible, they will appear as stars. Additionally, the safety driver was not paying attention. EDIT: In my opinion, the more you think about this crash the worse Uber looks. The LIDAR should have worked, the lighting was likely brighter than the video shows, the weather was good, no obvious distractor objects, the road was straight, no parties were impaired. The pedestrian had a big bulky bike and crossed at right angles to the car. This is nearly the most basic test of self-driving cars and it failed. The only way Uber would look worse is if it had happened in day time. On top of that, Uber disabled the Volvo auto-braking safety system. ( [LINK] )

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Brian Kaufman, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources