HackerTube.dev

Autonomous Car - what goes into sensing for autonomous driving?

Mobileye · 40K views · 2016-04-17 · 35:31

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Mobileye co-founder and CTO Amnon Shashua explains what goes into sensing for autonomous driving and whether end-to-end deep learning can work for it. He argues for decomposing the problem.

On Hacker News

Recommended as an accessible technical explanation of Mobileye's approach, and also cited in disputes over Tesla Autopilot.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2016–2016

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

brianchu · 2016-05 · Strong recommendation

Here is a great, very accessible video where the CTO of MobileEye (which provides some of the components for Tesla's "autopilot") explains his views on the challenges of end-to-end learning for autonomous vehicles, and why it's preferable to decompose the problem instead (still using deep learning for the decomposed modules). [VIDEO] I'm inclined to agree, especially because it helps in 1) providing diagnostic information (such as the great driving visualizations shown in the video), and 2) makes it easier to incorporate algorithms and sensors (like with Google's cars) as a redundancy in case the neural network hits a crazy edge case.

Read the original HN comment ↗
Animats · 2016-10 · Reference

Those are good points. Here's some backup. Here's Mobileeye's CTO talking in detail about their technology.[1] They use a a deep neural network that recognizes cars. Just cars. Look at this point in the video.[2] There's a stationary obstacle on the left, and it doesn't recognize that. Maybe this is why Tesla, using Mobileye hardware, plowed into three different stationary vehicles at the left of a highway. They were all trucks (one was a street sweeper), and seen from the back while stationary, may not have matched the trained model of "car". Mobileeye's algorithms are good at recognizing moving cars from most angles, and that's valuable for feeding into the model of "what's the other player doing". But it's not enough for the "where are all the obstacles" and "where is the road surface" questions. Those questions have objective answers, which can be answered with a LIDAR, and maybe millimeter radar if it has the angular resolution. [1] [VIDEO] [2] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
zeroecco · 2016-09 · Criticism

ugh, more ME noise. so ME has a lot of evidence that they are lying through their teeth, if they were so worried why let all the other brands do the hands free thing? [LINK] * ME boasting about their tech making hands free possible [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Mobileye, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources