HackerTube.dev

100%+ short interest in GameStop stock (GME) – fundamental & technical deep value analysis

Roaring Kitty · 1.8M views · 2020-07-28 · 56:32

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Roaring Kitty's July 2020 analysis of GameStop, arguing a bullish deep-value case when the stock was about $4 and short interest exceeded 100%. It covers fundamentals, cash balance and technicals.

On Hacker News

After the 2021 squeeze, HN cites it as the original thesis behind the GME story and praises its quality.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2021–2022

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

anm89 · 2022-02 · Strong recommendation

If you haven't watched his youtube content go watch it. It's unbelievably high quality. He comes of as a genuinely great guy and he the quality of the analysis he is doing is really good. Definitely puts some things around this story in perspective. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
CTDOCodebases · 2021-01 · Recommendation

u/DeepFuckingValue shits all over the writers narrative. Watch the video linked below if you disagree with me. [VIDEO] I guess if you are not used to interacting with people who have a sense of humour about everything and don’t take life too seriously then you are going to struggle to understand what’s going on in WSB. How can a gambler be nihilistic? Don’t you need hope to gamble?

Read the original HN comment ↗
soared · 2021-02 · Reference

[VIDEO] Roaring Kitty (Deep fing value)'s first video from 6 months ago on $GME answers your questions. It started as legitimate investing with some memes on the side, and then turned in memes with some legitimate investing on the side.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Roaring Kitty, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources