The Last Human – A Glimpse Into The Far Future

What people said

mLuby · 2023-01 · Recommendation

It's survivorship bias—where bias means skewed from the full distribution of choices people and societies made, not bias as in discrimination. Most of the families and societies that didn't prioritize population growth (by reproduction or immigration) aren't around to advocate for that approach's merits, whereas those that did are. Fun fact: for each human alive today there've been 15 deceased humans ever. As zombie apocalypses go, 15:1 doesn't sound too bad. Kurzgesagt has some interesting videos on human population if that's your style: [VIDEO] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Wurdan · 2023-12 · Reference

A line in a Kurzgesagt video ( [VIDEO] ) a while back caught my attention. “Every generation assumes they’re important enough to witness the apocalypse.” I don’t think that’s the only factor in people wishing for collapse, but I think it’s one of them.

Read the original HN comment ↗

lumenwrites · 2022-07 · Reference

Take a look at the recent Kurzgesagt video: [VIDEO] If humanity plays its cards right, there will be trillions and trillions of humans living in the future, all over the galaxy. Everyone who lives right now, or has ever lived, is barely noticeable compared to that. Take a look at the recent Less Wrong post: [LINK] I don't see any flaws in this argument, we all are on a fast-track to getting killed by AI, and the smartest people on the planet don't have a plan on how to fix it. "Build an AI that burns all GPUs to prevent all the future AIs, and hopefully doesn't kill us all in the process" is the best idea they've got. If you believe that we're about to kill trillions and trillions of potential future human beings, these priorities make sense.

Read the original HN comment ↗