HackerTube.dev

Linus Torvalds says GPL v3 violates everything that GPLv2 stood for

TFiR · 514.7K views · 2014-09-04 · 9:33

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A short TFiR clip of Linus Torvalds explaining why he thinks GPLv3 violates what GPLv2 stood for. He describes why he chose GPLv2 for kernel development and his view of the FSF's approach.

On Hacker News

Cited again and again in GPL licensing debates as the primary source for Linus's objections to GPLv3.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2015–2025

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

jraph · 2021-09 · Recommendation

Well, I don't think I agree with him and would licence GPL code with the "or later" clause, but he has a very reasonable and convincing argument against it. See this video of him explaining his take on GPLv3 and the "or later" clause at Deb Conf if you are interested: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rkowalick · 2018-01 · Recommendation

Here is an excellent video of Linus talking about why he specifically chose the GPLv2 and how he felt betrayed when the FSF released GPLv3: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
knowknow · 2025-12 · Reference

Keep in mind that Linux doesn’t use the GPL3 and stuck with the GPL2 since the maintainers and Linus Torvalds thought that it was overly restrictive [1]. So at some point the license friction becomes too large to be practical for organizations to use or contribute to. [1] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by TFiR, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources