HackerTube.dev

The Case for String Theory - Sixty Symbols

Sixty Symbols · 746.4K views · 2017-01-30 · 17:56

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Sixty Symbols interviews Nottingham cosmologist Tony Padilla, who says string theory deserves to be taken seriously. He explains how strings emerged from the equations rather than being invented.

On Hacker News

It is cited in string theory arguments as a counterweight to critics, a working physicist's reason to think there is something to the theory.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2017–2022

Topics

Quantum physicsCosmology & astrophysics
Search by tags
string theorytony padillatheoretical physicscosmologysixty symbols

What people said

snarfy · 2018-07 · Recommendation

I've never found a good description or explanation of string theory for the layman. I look, but then I always run into Brian Greene. I did find this video[1], where a professor explains why he at least believes there is something to it. Tl;dr - they weren't looking for strings. They sort of 'popped out' of the equations. [1] = [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
the6threplicant · 2017-06 · Recommendation

I like [VIDEO] (The case for String Theory). It shows that there is a natural progression to String Theory that very few other theories have.

Read the original HN comment ↗
rajman187 · 2022-11 · Reference

I read her book Lost in Math [1] which I have to say was quite a laborious endeavour. It is essentially a long-winded argument that is better summarised in this article and her YouTube channel, though she got to visit many scholars across the globe. Some agreed with her to a certain extent while others simply didn't (Nima Arkani-Hamid, for example, had no interest in her point of view). What I found most lacking was a viable path forward, an alternative to all this nay-saying. She had a section in the end with bullet points on what to do and not do, but it was quite brief and generic. I had a short but interesting exchange on Twitter with Dr. Tony Padilla who has spoken about the case for string theory on Numberphile [2]. He stands at the opposite end of the spectrum of course, and it's worth listening to what he has to say as well. Being a non-expert with just a casual interest in the inner workings of the universe, I am eagerly awaiting whatever the next breakthrough brings for our understanding of the cosmos, but I have to say that string theory and susy have seemed to over-promise and under-deliver with little prospect in sight, and perhaps at the detriment of a more fundamental or foundational approach. Indeed, the question of what is time has always bothered me, so I'm picking up Carlo Rivelli's book on this next [3]. [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO] [3] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Sixty Symbols, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources