HackerTube.dev

How can less be more?

Christoffer Neese · 567.1K views · 2012-02-06 · 0:18

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A very short clip of Yngwie Malmsteen explaining why he thinks the phrase 'less is more' is wrong and that more is more.

On Hacker News

HN mostly uses it as a joke or punchline in threads about minimalism versus excess.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2017–2018

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

gameswithgo · 2018-02 · Joke / meme

A lot of amateur endurance athletes will hear about elite coaches or athletes saying things like "quality over quantity" or "less is more" and not realize that the context of those comments is something like: "I was training 40 hours a week but I realized if I did better if I dropped it to 30 hours a week with more specificity or harder hard days". They then use that to justify not doing more than their comparatively tiny workload, which is psychologically natural since you don't want to do more! But until you get up to the point where more is too much, which is usually more than you imagine, more is usually more. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
stuffedBelly · 2017-05 · Joke / meme

This reminds me of guitarist Yngwie Malmsteen's famous "How can less be more?" interview ( [VIDEO] )

Read the original HN comment ↗
klodolph · 2017-03 · Joke / meme

There's a raft of articles where people share their forays into minimalism. Minimalism is mostly a way to show cultural value, like wearing black turtlenecks or making your children take piano lessons. We add maxims like "less is more" to justify these things but "less is more" is such a vacuous justification you can discard it without thought. Yngwie Malmsteen's pithy thoughts on "less is more" (very short): [VIDEO] If you want data, there are a few usability studies on the use of multiple monitors. The general consensus is that bigger monitors are better and two monitors are better than one, three or more monitors might be too many. These studies are easy enough to find on Google so I'm not going to link them here. Data will always beat maxims. On a personal note, I find it easier to work with multiple monitors rather than one larger monitor, possibly due to software support. I'll want two web browsers up, side by side, on one monitor, and then the other monitor can hold editors and terminal windows. There tends to be pretty good software support for dividing a monitor in half, which supports this workflow very well on two monitors, but dividing a monitor in four is a bit rare. Stuff I don't really need like mail, music players, and the like get relegated to other virtual desktops.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Christoffer Neese, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources