HackerTube.dev

RailsConf 2019 - Opening Keynote by David Heinemeier Hansson

Confreaks · 45.8K views · 2019-05-20 · 1:01:08

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

David Heinemeier Hansson's opening keynote at RailsConf 2019 argues against the expectation of payment for open source work, drawing on his experience releasing Rails. It also includes lighter asides about the industry.

On Hacker News

It is the go-to reference in debates about whether open source maintainers are owed compensation, and commenters say it is worth watching even for non-Rails developers.

Recommended by 3 HN people across 4 months · HN mentions 2019–2022

Topics

Software practice, open source & careersPython, Ruby & scripting languagesWeb development
Search by tags
dhhrailsopen sourcefundingrailsconf

What people said

activitypea · 2022-09 · Recommendation

>25 dollars a month for solo projects >125 dollars a month per seat for companies That's.. irregular. I really have nothing nice to say about this model, so I'll just leave a really good conf talk here. The part around 8:30 is really pertinent to this situation. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
nickjj · 2020-11 · Recommendation

This reminds me of a lot of DHH's keynote about open source from last year: [VIDEO] Even if you're not a Rails developer it's worth watching. From what I remember from the talk he is totally fine with and doesn't hold any grudges against Twitter, GitHub or Shopify making hundreds of millions of dollars off Ruby on Rails while getting zero compensation in return. Mainly because he open sourced Rails with no monetary / fame expectations and then worried about generating income from services around his open source project. I don't know Marak's history but I do know developing a good faker library definitely isn't trivial, so I'm sure his work is very much appreciated by the folks who use it but I think if you're doing open source work for money and other non-pure byproducts you're only setting your self up for disappointment.

Read the original HN comment ↗
westoque · 2019-08 · Recommendation

> Given the amount of value open source provides to for-profit companies (with the open source maintainers rarely getting any reciprocal value from the companies that profit off them), why is it so alarming to think that these maintainers might think of a clever idea like this to make a couple thousand bucks? Because it's not a clever idea at all. First of all, open source software should stay true to what is is, which is free and open. If maintainers really wanted to profit off of this, they should have never made it free or at least offer some sort of pricing model that doesn't affect the essence of the project being open source (e.g., offering paid support), projects like Sidekiq having Sidekiq Pro. Users shouldn't be the one "paying" for open source software through the ads. This is making developers pay for the project indirectly. DHH latest keynote from Railsconf 2019 hits the nail in the coffin: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Confreaks, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources