HackerTube.dev

Prediction Markets: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

LastWeekTonight · 4.4M views · 2026-04-20 · 32:59

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

John Oliver's Last Week Tonight segment examines prediction markets such as Polymarket: the legal and moral questions, weak regulation, and insider trading and manipulation concerns.

On Hacker News

HN cites it in prediction-market threads as an accessible critical overview, including the Polymarket CEO's remarks on insider trading.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2026–2026

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

w-m · 2026-04 · Recommendation

John Oliver had a segment on prediction markets this week. It covers insider training and opportunities for blatant manipulation like this, well worth checking out. The example in the Last Week Tonight segment was betting on dildos being thrown on court during a WNBA match. And then travelling to the match to throw the dildo. [0] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
MikeTheGreat · 2026-07 · Reference

Genuine question: do prediction markets open up a new revenue stream for TheNumbers.com? Specifically: they suspect that the motivation for trying to hack their site (for at least some people) is that they wanted early access to numbers that folks were betting on in prediction markets. Since they've got those numbers they can just bet on them, then benefit from their perfect knowledge. On the one hand this does seem incredibly unethical (it's clearly insider trading). On the other hand the CEO of PolyMarket has said that insider trading is part of the point of PolyMarket: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
otterley · 2026-05 · Reference

The social costs of gambling, particularly compulsive gambling, cannot be so easily dismissed. I would encourage you to visit your local Gamblers’ Anonymous group or seek out addicts’ stories of loss and despair to get a fuller picture of it. As for expected losses, yes, there is a legitimate trade in securities in which some will earn money from their investments and some will lose money from them. Securities like stocks, bonds, derivatives, commodities, and so forth have real things of value underneath them, like business income and stuff made from the commodities. (And it’s not a minority who earn long-term gains from these; there are entire pension schemes covering millions of people that are funded from them from 401(k)s to TIAA.) Predictions, on the other hand, are valued solely based on human estimations. That’s not in itself a problem, but the issue is that predictions markets, unlike securities markets, are not regulated. Compare the fact that insider trading of securities is illegal and punished with fines and imprisonment, while in a predictions market, insider trading is incentivized and occurs with unsurprising frequency (e.g. big wins by a privileged few who bet on the timing of military actions). Market manipulation is the problem, not that some will make the wrong bets. The rules and conditions of the game must be fair, even if the outcome of the game isn’t. And I haven’t even begun to mention the issue of the things you can bet on in prediction markets that a

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by LastWeekTonight, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources