HackerTube.dev

Stanford Seminar: Beyond Floating Point: Next Generation Computer Arithmetic

Stanford Online · 32.8K views · 2017-02-03 · 1:31:28

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

John Gustafson presents posits, a proposed drop-in replacement for IEEE 754 floats that is simpler in hardware and more flexible in precision. The seminar includes a live demo and machine learning results.

On Hacker News

Cited in floating-point threads as the main introduction to posits and unums as an alternative to IEEE floats.

Recommended by 5 HN people across 3 months · HN mentions 2017–2021

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

gbrown_ · 2018-06 · Recommendation

For anyone interested in this sort of thing you'd probably also be interested in John Gustafson's work on unums/posits. Here's a nice introductory presentation [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
dnautics · 2017-09 · Recommendation

You may like: [VIDEO] It turns out the math is slightly harder but it's faster than IEEE FP in hardware, probably because of less conditionals in the spec. There is better performance in terms of numerical accuracy at the cost of substantially more difficult error analysis. Disclaimer: I'm in the video.

Read the original HN comment ↗
espeed · 2017-02 · Recommendation

Have you seen "Stanford Seminar: Beyond Floating Point: Next Generation Computer Arithmetic"? [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Stanford Online, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources