Rich Hickey rants about HttpServletRequest in 1080p: Death By Specificity from Clojure Made Simple

Fred Overflow · 42.7K views · 2019-11-30 · 4:57

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A five-minute excerpt of Rich Hickey's Clojure Made Simple talk, with new slides, ranting about HttpServletRequest and specificity. He argues for using generic maps instead of many specific classes and getters.

On Hacker News

Cited as the classic rant on maps versus objects in discussions of data modeling and OOP.

Recommended by 5 HN people across 5 months · HN mentions 2020–2026

Topics

Software architecture & design Functional programming Databases & storage

What people said

travisjungroth · 2023-11 · Strong recommendation
A classic rant by Rich Hickey: [VIDEO] I say this even though I don’t usually code this way: I think the big benefit for business code is sort of a constrained flexibility. Objects tend to get really big (the alternative is you have a ton of classes). Think about all the data that makes up one Uber ride. So if I want to do anything with a Ride, I need everything. An even the many classes thing doesn’t really solve that because maybe what I want is cross-cutting. So either way, I just end up having to supply a bunch of stuff I don’t need. The maps-first approach is more incremental. Every function takes what it needs and gives what it can.
Read the original HN comment ↗

daly · 2021-04 · Strong recommendation
Rich Hickey "thinks in lisp". For example, he talks about his "maps" data structure (aka association lists). See [VIDEO] Since data and programs are the same thing in lisp you can fluidly shift from one to the other, like I did with "knowledge" vs "rules". They both have the same representation (defstructs) but they are also code and have execution semantics. Clojure allows you to do this with map objects. The fact that you can use the whole language on everything at any time and that everything at any time is also "the language" is how you "think in lisp". Nobody thinks of Python programs as "data" or data as Python programs. Watch anything Rich Hickey talks about. He really "gets it".
Read the original HN comment ↗

TacticalCoder · 2021-03 · Strong recommendation
> Do people actually build large codebases with the 'hash map first' approach? There are a few large projects written in Clojure. I'd say it's a "data first" approach, not uniquely "map first". There's this famous 4 minutes rant by Rich Hickey (the creator of Clojure) where he talks about maps and about how Java does OOP (and how maps are served through getters but you can't see easily that they're maps), it's golden: [VIDEO]
Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Fred Overflow, played through YouTube.

HN Library · Source license

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks

SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources