Computers for Cynics 2 - It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC

What people said

tod222 · 2014-04 · Recommendation

Thank you. Nelson does a great job enumerating the limitations of PARC's vision and the capabilities absent from PARC's work. After being exposed to PARC's self-congratulatory self-promotion for decades, Nelson's history is a breath of fresh air. This is not to devalue what PARC accomplished, but that its accomplishments must be taken in perspective. It All Went Wrong at Xerox PARC is also on YouTube: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

seltzered_ · 2023-12 · Reference

This comment jogged my memory of a Ted Nelson video subtitled 'It all went wrong at Xerox PARC' : [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

leoc · 2014-01 · Criticism

It's Ted Nelson rattling through some of his computer-history notes on camera. So it's good material, but it's much better presented in his enjoyable and reasonably-priced book /Geeks Bearing Gifts/ [LINK] . I noted a couple of apparent mistakes: at [VIDEO] Nelson says that Xerox paid Jobs to look at the PARC work, while AFAIK Apple in fact paid Xerox, in pre-IPO Apple stock. He also suggested that Xerox tried to bring in Jobs, when it seems to have been Apple who made the approach (at the instigation of Jef Raskin at Apple). [VIDEO] is misleading. PARC was more-or-less forbidden to buy a DEC PDP-10, which would have reflected badly on the competing machines from Xerox's new acquisition Scientific Data Systems, so PARC built a PDP-10 clone (the MAXC) in-house for their own use. That had very little to do with why they later designed and built the Altos: there was nothing remotely similar to an Alto out there that they could have bought (Nelson knows this).

Read the original HN comment ↗