HackerTube.dev

Copyright Deadlock (The Jimquisition)

Stephanie Sterling · 772.8K views · 2016-04-28 · 10:40

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A Jimquisition episode by Jim Sterling demonstrating the Copyright Deadlock, where a video includes footage owned by several companies so that competing YouTube Content ID claims cancel each other out. It highlights how absurd the system is.

On Hacker News

HN cites it as the clearest explanation of how broken Content ID is and of the deadlock trick for defeating forced monetization.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2016–2021

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

dessant · 2018-08 · Strong recommendation

Jim Sterling has done a brilliant job at explaining how broken the YouTube Content ID system is, and how to prevent these companies from monetizing your work (though you don't get to run ads on the videos either). Possibly NSFW: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
pdkl95 · 2021-06 · Reference

[VIDEO] (cw: strong language) TL;DW - nothing happens, it's an unresolvable deadlock. This "feature" can sometimes be used by deliberately adding many easily claimable works in a video to prevent anybody from monetizing it.

Read the original HN comment ↗
pdkl95 · 2019-05 · Reference

Jim Sterling talking about including footage from multiple companies as a "copyright deadlock": [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Stephanie Sterling, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources