HackerTube.dev

Visualizing the 4d numbers Quaternions

3Blue1Brown · 5.6M views · 2018-09-06 · 31:51

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

3Blue1Brown builds visual intuition for quaternions, showing how to think about this four-dimensional number system using stereographic projection and rotations in 3D space. It is part one of a two-part series with an interactive companion site.

On Hacker News

HN commenters recommend it as the best visual explanation of quaternions and a good way to visualize higher dimensions.

Recommended by 6 HN people across 6 months · HN mentions 2018–2023

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

Twisol · 2018-09 · Strong recommendation

I'm happy to see 3Blue1Brown's most recent video [0] get a mention in this article! He does a great job of explaining quaternions though visual intuition. (I do think simply calling Grant a "math animator" is selling him a bit short. He's a true educator in every sense; animation is just one of the (very effective) learning aides he uses.) [0] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
nkrisc · 2023-07 · Recommendation

I found this video explaining quaternions to actually be a great way to explain (and visualize) higher spatial dimensions: [VIDEO] When you think about the nth dimension as a projection of the n+1th dimension, it begins to make a lot more sense. That doesn’t mean you can necessarily visualize the 4th spatial dimension directly, but you can at least visualize how the 3rd dimension can be a projection of the 4th, just like how we can easily see that the 2nd dimension as a projection of the third.

Read the original HN comment ↗
Jun8 · 2021-12 · Recommendation

3B1B is also informative, especially in explaining why C was not extended using triplets but 4-tuples were needed: [VIDEO] . Here’s a Math SE answer on why: [LINK] , here’s a more ELI5 discussion: [LINK] . I especially like this very intuitive comment in that thread : [LINK] Left as an exercise to reader: prove that no such n-tuples exist for n>4.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by 3Blue1Brown, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources