HackerTube.dev

Updated BP Texas City Animation on the 15th Anniversary of the Explosion

USCSB · 2.3M views · 2020-03-23 · 11:05

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

The US Chemical Safety Board's updated animation of the 2005 BP Texas City refinery explosion, which killed 15 workers. It was released ahead of a process safety training application.

On Hacker News

HN recommends the CSB's accident reconstruction animations as clear, worthwhile case studies of industrial disasters.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2022–2025

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

Lammy · 2025-03 · Recommendation

> I read about it in one of the disaster reports about the Texas City BP refinery explosion. Relevant part of USCSB accident reconstruction animation: [VIDEO] (but worth watching the whole thing!)

Read the original HN comment ↗
nickpinkston · 2023-03 · Recommendation

Yea, that's an interesting perspective. I do wondering if we can learn from a related, but successful form of failure content, which is the disaster/accident investigation videos. I watch a wide range from the classic TV airliner crashes [1], to highly detailed air crash disaster investigation reports / training [2], to industrial / other accidents [3], to gov't industrial accidents reports / simulations [4]. I wonder if there's anything to be gained from way that content succeeds while business failures don't? Is it just that startup failures aren't as dramatic? It's not a clear-cut kind of narrative that's satisfying? No idea... These are all great: [1] Tenerife Crash for TV: [LINK] [2] Tenerife Crash for Pilots: [LINK] [3] SL1 Nuclear Accident: [LINK] [4] BP Texas City: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
bendbro · 2022-10 · Reference

> fire tube This has a similar style to oilfield names. I giggle when I hear them used in USCSB disaster videos. > An entry in the centralized control room logbook: “ISOM: Brought in some raff to unit, to pack raff with” You don't say. And this led to an explosion? [LINK] [LINK] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by USCSB, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources