A New Way to look at Networking

What people said

barrkel · 2024-09 · Strong recommendation

Consider a society that has left Earth. If light takes minutes to travel between locations, is a chatty protocol what you want? Or do you need a whole host of different application-level solutions to this problem? There's a different lens to look at it. There's an old tech talk that got me out of the IP-shaped box a lot of us are trapped in: [VIDEO] I got Gemini 1.5 Pro to summarize the transcript, which I butchered a bit to fit in a text box: The Problem: The Internet is treated as a binary concept: You're either connected or not, leading to issues with mobile devices and seamless connectivity. The focus on connections (TCP/IP conversations) hinders security: Security is tied to the pipe, not the data, making it difficult to address issues like spam and content integrity. Inefficient use of resources: Broadcasting and multi-point communication are inefficient as the network is unaware of content, leading to redundant data transmission. The Proposed Solution: Data-centric architecture: Data is identified by name, not location. This enables: Trust and integrity based on data itself, not the source. Efficient multi-point communication and broadcasting. Seamless mobility and intermittent connectivity. Improved security against spam, phishing, and content manipulation. Key principles: Data integrity and trust are derived from the data itself through cryptographic signatures and verification. Immutable content with versioning and updates through supersession. Data segmentation for

Read the original HN comment ↗

pololee · 2017-06 · Recommendation

Very good reading. I'd also recommend Van Jacobson's talk [VIDEO] You'll learn some good stories about internet history. He has done a lot of work on TCP congestion control, especially the fast retransmission idea by using duplicate ACKs. There is an interesting thing about TCP. A lot of popular TCP implementation use city names, e.g. TCP Reno, TCP Vegas, TCP Westwood. TCP Westwood is a very interesting implementation. It has very intelligent way to estimate bandwidth, (not just based on duplicate ACKs). You may find this paper very interesting. [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗

seiji · 2012-07 · Recommendation

Ye olde, but still worth watching: Van Jacobson's Google Talk from 2006, "A New Way to look at Networking": [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗