HackerTube.dev

7 Minutes of Terror: Curiosity Rover's Risky Mars Landing | Video

VideoFromSpace · 1.2M views · 2012-06-22 · 5:07

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

NASA's animated explanation of the Curiosity rover's Mars landing, which relied on a complex automated sequence taking about seven minutes. It features NASA engineers discussing the risks before the 2012 landing.

On Hacker News

Recommended as a gripping look at how hard Mars entry, descent and landing is.

Recommended by 3 HN people across 3 months · HN mentions 2017–2021

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

perryizgr8 · 2020-06 · Strong recommendation

> Oh, it has to land like the Falcon 9 as well, except hovering and lowering itself on a tether, like the Air Cav for Mars. Here's a video that blows my mind every time I watch it. [VIDEO] Such a complicated landing sequence, and needs to work correctly the first time, all autonomously. And it worked!

Read the original HN comment ↗
niftich · 2017-08 · Strong recommendation

For a dramatic coverage of this exact subject, I highly recommend 'Curiosity's Seven Minutes of Terror' [1] from NASA JPL. [1] [LINK] or on Youtube: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rossdavidh · 2021-01 · Recommendation

Somewhat over-the-top but still cool discussion of this by actual NASA tech folks, made before the landing actually happened: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by VideoFromSpace, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources