Shoshana Zuboff on surveillance capitalism | VPRO Documentary

What people said

boraoztunc · 2022-02 · Reference

Advertising and online advertising are different things. Advertising was a thing, long before technology. Great ad people (like David Ogilvy) was created effective, targeted advertising and achieved success. How to Create Advertising That Sells Ad by David Ogilvy [1972] [LINK] What I meant was, there is nothing wrong with advertising, or targeting right people to deliver value, products, services to them with creative approaches. Online advertising though, especially programmatic, is totally a different scheme. I suggest reading more about; "Surveillance Capitalism" Professor Shoshana Zuboff, author of “[The Age of Surveillance Capitalism]( [LINK] , who coined the term surveillance capitalism in 2014, defines it as; " …the unilateral claiming of private human experience as free raw material for translation into behavioral data. These data are then computed and packaged as prediction products and sold into behavioral futures markets — business customers with a commercial interest in knowing what we will do now, soon, and later." In an interview with The Gurdian, Zuboff explains how surveillance capitalism is a human creation; >It lives in history, not in technological inevitability. It was pioneered and elaborated through trial and error at Google in much the same way that the Ford Motor Company discovered the new economics of mass production or General Motors discovered the logic of managerial capitalism. >Surveillance capitalism was invented around 2001 as the solution to fi

Read the original HN comment ↗

chiefalchemist · 2021-12 · Reference

> For skeptics, Bremmer poses this question: Who will do more to influence the outcome of next year’s US midterm congressional elections: The President of the United States or the CEO of Meta? According to Bremmer, since the vote will be influenced by both real-world rules changes and the online flow of information, the answer isn’t obvious. The question is flawed. Better would be: - From the perspective of the status quo power (i.e., US government) what is the bigger threat to that power persisting or not, China or Big Tech? (Hint: It's not China). - Put a slightly different way, on a day to day basis who is better positioned to influence the thoughts and decisions of individuals, some elected official or Big Tech? --- While she doesn't get heavily into gov v tech per se, "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" does a thorough job of framing the massive depth and breadth of tech's power, especially when it comes to tracking and influence. --- [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

chiefalchemist · 2021-12 · Reference

Has Nobel bar been lowered? I can't tell if this is a misunderstanding of the current state of the world, hypocrisy, or a combination of both. The State (as well as traditional Media), regardless of country, is losing its power and influence. Big Tech knows more and thus is able to influence more. The USA and other "democracies" are not immune to this shift. If nothing else, Covid has swung the pendulum back a bit, or has at least delayed Big Tech's complete undermining of the long standing status quo. That status quo isn't going to surrender. So do not expect 21st Century totalitarianism to look like the 20th Century variety. No one saw it coming then, just as too few see it coming now. I mention this book often on HN, "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" spells out the history and The Truth in a very 21st Century way. [VIDEO] Calling out Russia isn't bold or new. In fact, it's a dangerous distraction.

Read the original HN comment ↗