HackerTube.dev

The Voting System That's Actually Too Good for Politicians to Allow

CGP Grey · 10.4M views · 2014-10-22 · 6:47

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

CGP Grey explains the Single Transferable Vote, a proportional ranked-ballot system, and why politicians have little incentive to adopt it. It is a short animated explainer of how multi-winner ranked voting works.

On Hacker News

HN's default link for explaining STV in any thread on voting reform, ranked choice or gerrymandering.

Recommended by 7 HN people across 7 months · HN mentions 2015–2021

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

CivBase · 2017-12 · Strong recommendation

Gerrymandering is a problem because we have a poor voting system. I'm not sure if a single transferrable vote (STV) is the best system, but it would significantly reduce the benefit of gerrymandering (and probably result in better candidates from both parties). CGP Grey did a great video on STV: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
s_dev · 2019-10 · Recommendation

Ireland uses this appraoch. We call it STV. STV Explained -- [VIDEO] It just a better democracy because it's more representative. It's solves the "wasted vote" problem people have with democracy and why many democracies result in a two party system. This way it ensures your vote is counted and multiple parties exist.

Read the original HN comment ↗
lpolzer · 2019-03 · Recommendation

Now if only they would introduce something like Single Transferable Vote (entertaining CGPGrey video: [VIDEO] ), or another more effective voting system. Probably won't happen though, as it would seriously shake up politics as we know it.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by CGP Grey, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources