HackerTube.dev

Gabbard Diagram for Low Earth Orbit 1959-2021

Tim · 3.1K views · 2021-02-03 · 4:09

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

An animated Gabbard diagram of objects in low Earth orbit from 1959 to 2021, showing altitude over time. It highlights major debris-generating events and how low-altitude debris decays out of orbit.

On Hacker News

HN uses it to illustrate orbital debris evolution and how altitude determines how fast debris decays.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2021–2023

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

Heliosmaster · 2023-11 · Reference

generally when two satellites collide some debris can be shot at a higher orbit which will take forever (or will not) reenter atmosphere. See the scatterplot of debris for the Chinese collision test of 2000: [LINK] See this video for evolution of debris and altitude over time: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
xoa · 2023-07 · Reference

>Do a search for "atmospheric drag" or anything about orbital lifetimes, gabbard diagrams [0] or the like >nothing, instead it equates all constellations and satellites together as the same thing Yet another click bait crummy article, with the obligatory "concerned astronomers" emotional tug on top but no serious engagement. And "big numbers!!" but no sort of context on if or why it's a problem. It's so tiresome how this gets trotted out over and over again. SpaceX's approach isn't bad for debris risks, it's good! The absolute best possible fail safe solution for sats is to have them low enough that they will passively deorbit very quickly without continuous boosts, or even better VLEO orbits where they must maintain aerodynamic orientation as well. Which in turn requires lots of sats that are actively replaced regularly, which in turn helps ensure updates can also be made rapidly based on real experience and they can become extremely refined. Sloppily throwing it all into some vague fear panic of "Kessler Syndrome" is not just wrong it's actively bad for that very reason vs clear differentiation between stuff at 300-550km vs 700+. Also the implication that the utility function for earth-based astronomers is unlimited and they have some special right on top, ignoring the potential future paths for improvement and approaches that would ensure that (a small tax that would go directly towards a fund for space based telescopes say). And so on and so forth. There are real importan

Read the original HN comment ↗
MichaelCollins · 2022-09 · Reference

[VIDEO] "Gabbard Diagram for Low Earth Orbit 1959-2021" See how the stuff in the lower left corner speeds up towards the lower left corner? That's low flying debris falling out of space.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Tim, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources