HackerTube.dev

Pentagon officially released 'UFO' videos: BUSTED (Part 1)

Thunderf00t · 395.2K views · 2020-05-03 · 20:53

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Thunderf00t argues that the Pentagon's officially released 'UFO' videos have mundane explanations such as birds, parallax and sensor artifacts.

On Hacker News

HN cites it as a debunking whenever Pentagon UFO footage is discussed.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2020–2022

Topics

Media, journalism & propagandaReligion, belief & skepticism
Search by tags
ufopentagondebunkingparallaxskepticism

What people said

danbruc · 2022-03 · Criticism

At least those videos [1] are just birds, see for example this analysis [2]. Skip to the meat of it, if you dislike the style of the video. [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
oceanghost · 2021-07 · Criticism

I've said it once, I'll say it again-- these videos are all explained and all have been debunked. This is most likely a advertisement for the US Military's ability to track very small things such as drones. If there are videos of things that might be alien-- these are not them. [VIDEO] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] [LINK] Bob Lazar debunk: [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
etrabroline · 2021-05 · Criticism

It is obvious to any expert that these are not space aliens. that makes the question of why the Navy is hyping them even more interesting. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Thunderf00t, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources