HackerTube.dev

The man who almost faked his way to a Nobel Prize

BobbyBroccoli · 4.2M views · 2020-08-06 · 42:30

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

BobbyBroccoli's first of three parts on Jan Hendrik Schon, the Bell Labs postdoc whose fabricated organic semiconductor results nearly won a Nobel Prize. It covers his rise and the context around Bell Labs.

On Hacker News

HN repeatedly recommends the series as a gripping account of scientific fraud, and cites it whenever research misconduct comes up.

Recommended by 6 HN people across 5 months · HN mentions 2022–2023

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

atrettel · 2023-11 · Strong recommendation

For those unfamiliar with the story of Jan Hendrik Schön, I suggest watching this excellent series of videos by BobbyBroccoli on YouTube [1-3]. The series does a good job breaking down the context and the situation that Schön was in, along with the incentives that encouraged Schön to commit fraud. [1] [VIDEO] [2] [LINK] [3] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
asmor · 2023-07 · Strong recommendation

Schön got away with it for years. One of my favorite video essays is a long exploration of that case: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
treesciencebot · 2023-07 · Strong recommendation

This reminds me an amazing piece of documentary[1] I've watched a couple months prior about a man who tried to "scam his way onto a Nobel prize". It really goes into showing how the majority of the system is based on trust and reputation and without well skepticism fraudsters can thrive. [1]: "The man who almost faked his way to a Nobel Prize" -- [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by BobbyBroccoli, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources