HackerTube.dev

Triangle of Power

3Blue1Brown · 812.5K views · 2016-06-26 · 7:42

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

3Blue1Brown presents the Triangle of Power, an alternate notation that unifies powers, logarithms and roots in a single triangular symbol. The video shows how the inverse operations relate and how the notation could help.

On Hacker News

HN points to it in notation debates as a clean visual demonstration that exponents, logs and roots are three views of one relationship.

Recommended by 5 HN people across 4 months · HN mentions 2016–2023

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

hashar · 2023-06 · Strong recommendation

I opened the video in the background and immediately recognized the person: the author behind the 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel. It has a long series of video regarding various mathematical topics which are rather accessible. My favorite by far is a "proposal" for an alternate notation which makes much more sense and, if adopted, would make mathematics way less intimidating (Triangle of Power (2016), 3Blue1Brown - [VIDEO] ). I'd give him a Fields medal (or at least an honorary mention of some sort) :-]

Read the original HN comment ↗
Houshalter · 2017-06 · Strong recommendation

My favorite new math notation is the triangle of power: [VIDEO] I slightly modified it to avoid subscript and keep it closer to existing notation for powers: [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
Banana699 · 2022-04 · Recommendation

Bad/Confusing/Complex notation can absolutely ruin a learner's attempt to grok a piece of math, it's not a trivial issue at all, and it comes up in all levels of math. But good notation doesn't necessarily mean easy understanding. It's just like language. If I speak a different language, forget about communication in any deep way. But even if I'm speaking the same language, it's still not guaranteed we can communicate well or at all. Absence of shared language guarantees the impossibility of communication, but it's presence guarantees nothing. The author is correct about one thing : Notation is incredibly under-appreciated and under-discussed by mathematicians, although it has immense power to shape thinking. Some visionaries like Charles Babbage, Kenneth Iverson or Stephan Wolfram might talk about it every 50 year or so, but that's it. It's mind boggling how the primary tool of communication is just developed ad-hoc on a whim with only minimal explanation and formalization. >But is there some book or dictionary that lays this out in a novel way What do you mean by "this"? is it specifically the overbars-and-underbars notation used in the article? as far as I know, that's the first time I encountered it. But the idea that exponentials, logarithms and roots all basically say the same thing and that notations should reflect that is discussed a lot, 3blue1brown has a very well known video that explains it in a visual way. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by 3Blue1Brown, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources