HackerTube.dev

Tesla Crashes on Full Self Driving (FSD) BETA

AI Addict · 455.1K views · 2022-02-05 · 9:11

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

AI Addict reviews a Tesla Full Self-Driving Beta drive, showing hard braking, red-light running, wrong-way turns and a collision with a bollard. The video is timestamped by incident.

On Hacker News

Cited as evidence that FSD beta is unsafe and that self-driving is far from solved.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2022–2022

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

lm28469 · 2022-10 · Criticism

On a straight highway in sunny california maybe, in the city, on a mountain road, anywhere with snow or heavy rain or fog, it's game over and will always be if we keep using the current techs [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
enragedcacti · 2022-10 · Criticism

> No, I think this argument is largely correct. And frankly settled: anyone who's driven recent FSD beta versions knows very well that the cars "see just fine". They don't hit anything, they see and avoid obstacles. Only if you ignore times where intervention stopped it from hitting something, times where it did actually hit something, massive amounts of jitter and popping in the visual output, phantom braking, etc. Unless of course "recent" means n+1 where n is the version that crashed into something. Collision with bollard in Feb 2022: [VIDEO] attempts to plow through cyclist Feb 2022: [LINK] almost crashes into tram (can't gauge speed or direction?) Jun 2022: [LINK] Crashes into curb Aug 2022: [LINK] Phantom brake Sep 2022: [LINK] Almost colliding with bridge pillar 2 weeks ago: [LINK] Crashes into various objects in testing 2 weeks ago: [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rvz · 2022-04 · Criticism

> Works just fine for my two cars thanks.. This just reads 'Works fine on my machine' . > I feel like you haven't driven one? One does not need to be a beta tester or a crash test dummy to see enough reports and tests from others over the years, risking their lives on using this 'safety-critical' beta quality software to know that this contraption needs to be investigated and the reports speak for themselves. [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [0] [VIDEO] [1] [LINK] [2] [LINK] [3] [LINK] [4] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by AI Addict, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources