HackerTube.dev

Jeff Dean & Noam Shazeer — 25 years at Google: from PageRank to AGI

Dwarkesh Patel · 349.5K views · 2025-02-12 · 2:15:36

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Dwarkesh Patel interviews Google's Jeff Dean and Noam Shazeer about 25 years at the company, from PageRank and MapReduce to the Transformer, mixture of experts and Gemini. They also discuss where AI is heading.

On Hacker News

HN cites it for insight into Google researchers' views on AI progress and publishing, though one commenter finds the interview weak.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2025–2026

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

paulmist · 2026-06 · Recommendation

I first saw Noam on Dwarkesh’s podcast together with Jeff Dean. Recommend if you want a taste of what’s Google’s folks take on things. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
DarkCrusader2 · 2026-02 · Criticism

Yeah I also don't understand how he is able to get such high profile guests. His interview with Jeff Dean and Noam Shazeer last year[1] is so hilariously bad. Jeff and Noam kept trying to give really insightful answers on how they see AI development shaping in coming years and he was just steering the conversation to shallow and silly tabloid gossip (why don't you "just" let AI improve the next version in a loop so we can quickly have singularity, Jeff Dean AI running in a DC, evil Jeff Dean AI escaping containment and on and on). It was just embarrassing. The interview would have been so much better with just Jeff and Noam without him. [1] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
sosodev · 2025-11 · Reference

Here's some insight from Jeff Dean and Noam Shazeer's interview with Dwarkesh Patel [VIDEO] > When you think about divulging this information that has been helpful to your competitors, in retrospect is it like, "Yeah, we'd still do it," or would you be like, "Ah, we didn't realize how big a deal transformer was. We should have kept it indoors." How do you think about that? > Some things we think are super critical we might not publish. Some things we think are really interesting but important for improving our products; We'll get them out into our products and then make a decision.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Dwarkesh Patel, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Matches the configured criteria
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources