HackerTube.dev

The Most Common Cognitive Bias

Veritasium · 17.4M views · 2014-02-24 · 4:44

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A Veritasium video that runs the 2-4-8 rule-guessing puzzle on people to show how they test only examples that confirm their hypothesis. It uses this to illustrate confirmation bias and falsification.

On Hacker News

Recommended as a clear demonstration of confirmation bias and the value of trying to break your own hypothesis.

Recommended by 3 HN people across 3 months · HN mentions 2015–2023

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

avianlyric · 2023-12 · Recommendation

Veritasium has a great video[1] about people’s cognitive bias towards using examples that prove their mental model, rather than using examples that disprove their mental model. But if you want to actually confirm you have accurate understanding of something, testing examples that don't fit your metal model is the workable methodology (i.e. use a null hypothesis). Testing examples that do match your mental model only proves your model partially matches the actual model, but it does very little to actually identify misunderstandings, or improve your understanding. [1] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
nightcracker · 2021-09 · Recommendation

Experimental science is all based around ruling out the null hypothesis. For that it needs to be falsifiable . The hypothesis 'the dog can differentiate between A and B' is very hard to falsify. Because the dog could differentiate, but choose to not act. You would need a fairly complete understanding of the dogs mental workings, and scanners to study them. On the other hand, 'the dog can't differentiate between A and B' is much easier to falsify. If you repeat an experiment a sufficient amount of times and the dog consistently has different behavior between A and B, you can rule this null hypothesis out. That is the real reason we always 'assume the worst'. Because 'assume the worst' is the easiest to scientifically rule out. EDIT: I would suggest this video by Veritasium, which also touches on this, at a very fundamental level: [VIDEO] .

Read the original HN comment ↗
drhdylan88 · 2015-07 · Recommendation

Veritasium, a pretty interesting youtube channel, posted a video on this experiment a while back. I found the discussion afterwards to be more thought-provoking than this article. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Veritasium, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources