HackerTube.dev

Introducing WildCat

Boston Dynamics · 40.5M views · 2013-10-04 · 2:09

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Boston Dynamics shows WildCat, a four-legged robot built with DARPA funding that reached about 19 mph using bounding and galloping gaits.

On Hacker News

Used as a reference point when comparing other legged robots, such as the MIT Cheetah, on gait and speed.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2013–2015

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

minot · 2015-08 · Reference

Is this where Boston Robotics comes in? For heavy load, they have wild cat[wildcat] and for lighter loads, they have spot [spot]. For Ussain Bolt, there is the cheetah [cheetah] that can keep up with the pace peaking at over 29 miles per hour. All these are at various stages in development and as far as I understand not ready for production. spot [VIDEO] wildcat [VIDEO] cheetah [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
jmilloy · 2015-05 · Reference

I noticed the opposite in this one: [VIDEO] Which is to say, it looks more natural and more balanced with the legs out of sync.

Read the original HN comment ↗
CoffeeDregs · 2014-09 · Reference

The bounding part is very cool (I caught myself leaning forward in surprise [and mild horror?] as the machine jumped over the box instead of maneuvering around it). Besides not requiring fuel, does anyone know how this is different/better/unique than Google/BostonDynamic's WildCage? ( [VIDEO] ) I certainly agree that more people working on this is a good thing, but I'd like to understand the progress being made.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Boston Dynamics, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources