HackerTube.dev

9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon

BubbaLouis · 775.2K views · 2006-10-26 · 3:10

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Short clip of Donald Rumsfeld's 9/10/2001 speech acknowledging that $2.3 trillion in Pentagon transactions could not be tracked.

On Hacker News

Referenced when commenters discuss unaccounted government money, conspiracy theories, or financial fraud.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2019–2022

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

pazimzadeh · 2022-10 · Reference

Huh? If that was true then it would be services like AAVE or Uniswap which would be bankrupt, not the centralized finance Celsius. The idea that the traditional legal system prevents funny business with money is naive. 9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon [VIDEO] The Pentagon’s $35 Trillion Accounting Black Hole [LINK] [LINK] Pentagon's Defense Logistics Agency loses track of $800m [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
patrickk · 2021-06 · Reference

Another strange one is the speech than Rumsfeld gave about missing trillions at the Pentagon 1 day before 9/11, then completely forgotten in the face of increased military spending the next day. [LINK] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
briantakita · 2019-09 · Reference

9/10/2001: Donald Rumsfeld admitting that $2.3 trillion was unaccounted for from the Defense budget. Backpage story for sure. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by BubbaLouis, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources