HackerTube.dev

Adobe MAX 2011 - Photoshop Image Deblurring sneak

Peter Elst · 1.8M views · 2011-10-07 · 6:26

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A six-minute clip of Adobe's MAX 2011 sneak peek showing a Photoshop prototype that removes motion blur from photos. The audience reacts with astonishment as blurry images become legible.

On Hacker News

Linked as a memorable early demo of image deblurring whenever threads on image restoration or synthesis come up.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2012–2018

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

jloughry · 2018-03 · Reference

The audience reaction was great. It reminds me of a similar audience reaction in this video of motion kernel de-blurring in Adobe Photoshop from 2011 (at about 1:17 in the video) [VIDEO] Audience: "No way!" and "That's impossible!" and "How did it do that?"

Read the original HN comment ↗
c12 · 2017-09 · Reference

The low resolution to high resolution image synthesis reminds me of the unblur tool that Adobe demoed during Adobe MAX in 2011. Here is the relevant clip if you're interested [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
planckscnst · 2012-10 · Reference

Very impressive. It reminded me of a demo from Adobe at MAX 2011 that showed promising results; it was more focused on eliminating defects from real images to produce a more aesthetic result. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Peter Elst, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources