HackerTube.dev

Russian Invasion - Salami Tactics | Yes Prime Minister

British Comedy · 67.8K views · 2019-09-13 · 1:37

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A short scene from the British sitcom Yes Prime Minister in which officials describe 'salami tactics' for invading a country slice by slice. Each small step is too minor to justify a major response.

On Hacker News

HN uses it as shorthand for incremental aggression and escalation, in threads on geopolitics, trade and creeping encroachment.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2025–2026

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

HPsquared · 2025-11 · Recommendation

People like to imagine a big obvious threat that you respond to in kind, but what about a gradual creeping encroachment aka salami tactics? Classic scene from "Yes, Prime Minister": [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rasz · 2026-06 · Reference

Not if your red line is so far up your own bum hole you wont be able to see when someone reaches it Russian Invasion - Salami Tactics | Yes Prime Minister [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
jordanb · 2026-05 · Reference

The Soviets had a "no first strike" doctrine because they perceived themselves to be the stronger force on the continent. They had a huge standing army and massive numbers of armored vehicles and expected to be able to roll through the fudla gap and across western Europe as they had done through Eastern Europe in the final stages of WWII. NATO, on the other hand, expected to be overrun by the soviets and used the threat of nuclear counterattack to keep them from trying it. The Soviets built up their own nuclear deterrent to prevent NATO from responding with nukes (the MAD). If the US/NATO nuclear threat wasn't credible and the NATO armies were no match for the soviet army, then western Europe became a pawn for the soviets, leading the western allies to also invest in conventional arms. In short: the argument for the conventional forces was that the nuclear threat wasn't really credible because nobody would choose to end the world. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by British Comedy, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources