HackerTube.dev

Glenn Vanderburg of LivingSocial on why software development is an engineering discipline

O'Reilly · 17.4K views · 2015-03-19 · 41:47

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Glenn Vanderburg argues at the O'Reilly Software Architecture Conference that software development is an engineering discipline, even if immature. He contends the discredited body of knowledge called software engineering has led people to wrongly reject the label.

On Hacker News

Recommended in debates over whether software is real engineering, as a well-argued case that building is cheap relative to simulating.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2015–2018

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

jdiaz5513 · 2018-01 · Strong recommendation

Careful. Software engineering is very much a real engineering discipline, and it is a major cultural failing to not recognize it as such. Required viewing: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rb2k_ · 2015-06 · Recommendation

I don't have a particular dog in this fight, but I thought this is interesting: The last O'Reilly Software Architecture Conference had a talk by Glenn Vanderburg titled "why software development is an engineering discipline": [VIDEO] I think the author of the blogpost does a lot of the things discussed in the talk (e.g. comparing it mostly to civil engineering as opposed to all the other engineering disciplines).

Read the original HN comment ↗
mpweiher · 2017-08 · Reference

Actually, it is fundamentally different in that just building the thing / just running the experiment is cheaper than doing the simulations or proofs. Every other discipline does simulations because actually running the experiment is magnitudes more expensive and time consuming. See "Why software development is an engineering discipline" [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by O'Reilly, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources