HackerTube.dev

ATTOL: Autonomous Taxiing, Take-Off and Landing test flight

Airbus · 394.6K views · 2020-01-17 · 0:56

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Short Airbus footage of its ATTOL project, in which a test aircraft performed a fully automatic, vision-based take-off at Toulouse-Blagnac. The crew ran eight take-offs over several hours.

On Hacker News

Cited in autonomy debates as evidence that autonomous take-off aircraft exist and as an example of vision-based line following.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2021–2025

Topics

Aviation & aerospace engineeringComputer vision, speech & NLP
Search by tags
airbusattolautonomous flightcomputer visionaviation

What people said

rkomorn · 2025-09 · Reference

Not only that but they are even less capable of taking off on their own (see the work done by Airbus' ATTOL project [0] on what some of the more recent successes are). So I'm not sure what "planes can land on their own" gets us anyway even if autopilot on modern airliners can do an awful lot on their own (including following flight plans in ways that are more advanced than before). The Garmin Autoland basically announces "my pilot is incapacitated and the plane is going to land itself at <insert a nearby runway>" without asking for landing clearance (which is very cool in and of itself but nowhere near what anyone would consider autonomous). [0] [VIDEO] (among other things, but this video is arguably the most fun one) Edit: and yes maybe the "pilots are basically superfluous now" misconception is a pet peeve for me (and I'm guessing parent as well)

Read the original HN comment ↗
l33t2328 · 2022-06 · Reference

_sigh_ Yes. It can. You’re intentionally misrepresenting reality for what I suspect is some ideological fondness of Tesla. Sure, no _commercial_ plane can take off with autopilot, but such planes exist[1]. But, saying Cat IIIc is required for hands off landing is silly. It’s required for hands off landing in the absolute worst conditions. It’s needed only when conditions are so bad that you can’t safely taxi and you’ll be stuck on the runway. That’s why it’s not used. [1] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rtkwe · 2021-09 · Reference

They're still in a vastly more controlled environment than cars and moving at much lower speeds as well. If an auto taxiing plane has to avoid another airport vehicle something has gone massively wrong. Judging by this video [0] I'm not sure they're even worrying about collisions and are counting on the combination of pilots and ATC ground controllers to avoid issues while taxiing. It looks like the cameras are entirely focused on line following. [0] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Airbus, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources