HackerTube.dev

GitHub Actions Feels Bad

fasterthanlime · 118.5K views · 2023-12-23 · 26:27

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A fasterthanlime video essay arguing that GitHub Actions is a poorly designed system, with a history of personal computing and CI, and a look at how it works behind the scenes. It is sponsored by Brilliant.

On Hacker News

Pointed to in GitHub Actions threads as a well-argued critique of how brittle and confused the platform is.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 2 months · HN mentions 2024–2025

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

asmor · 2025-12 · Strong recommendation

See also this excellent video essay by fasterthanlime: GitHub Actions Feels Bad[1]. I'm pretty sure it contains the exact line of it being "deeply confused about being a package manager". [1]: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
mardifoufs · 2024-01 · Recommendation

I prefer GA to basically every other build system especially because of the plugins but yeah, and I think caching can be turned on... but it has tons of inconsistencies related to packages and deps. This video really highlighted just how brittle the whole thing is even behind the scenes: [VIDEO] (13:58 time stamp for the part that is especially relevant here)

Read the original HN comment ↗
supriyo-biswas · 2024-06 · Reference

> Knowing that a language is installed by default on the most popular Linux distribution can simplify certain concerns considerably The author laments the decline of such knowledge, but the proliferation of containers, combined with the marketing efforts of the large cloud providers has reduced the number of people who work with servers directly. I should say that this knowledge can be useful in certain niche situations, though. For example, I recently learned that GitHub Actions pulls in a basic set of utilities by using complicated distro detection[1], and Gitlab runners similarly pulls in a Docker image with git just to clone a repository! Instead, the proper way to address this situation would be to compile static binaries, that, by their very nature, become distribution agnostic. The only reason I assume this wasn't pursued, I assume, would be that the developers working on this weren't even aware this was an option. It's the reason I've been maintaining a small set of packages[2] that I mount into every CI container for my personal projects. I'm also quite hopeful about the cosmopolitan project[3] that builds fat binaries which can bridge this gap, although as I discovered, some containers even lack tools like gzip (which cosmopolitan depends on), so maybe static binaries it is. [1] [VIDEO] [2] [LINK] [3] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by fasterthanlime, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources