HackerTube.dev

Faking RTX Global Illumination vs. RTX | 100% Ray-Traced Game, Pt 1

Gamers Nexus · 259.9K views · 2019-02-28 · 27:27

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Gamers Nexus builds a fully ray-traced demo in Unreal Engine to compare faked global illumination with RTX ray-traced GI. It covers the gains in dynamic scenes and accuracy against the performance cost and noise.

On Hacker News

HN uses it as a reference for how noisy raw real-time ray tracing is and how it compares with traditional faked lighting.

Recommended by 1 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2019–2019

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

LoSboccacc · 2019-10 · Recommendation

this extremely interesting video show state of the art techniques used to fake global illumination without using ray-tracing and compares the result with the ray-traced variant [VIDEO] long story short moving object color casting light is the main visible difference that cannot be replicated with traditional techniques (like baking the light reflection in the scene at built time, but can be faked convincingly); ray-tracing is also not limited at reflecting elements that are on the scene like what you'd get from screen space reflection, which is less noticeable of an effect but is there if you pay attention and know what to look for.

Read the original HN comment ↗
missosoup · 2019-09 · Reference

And yet I cite 3 unrelated sources that all corroborate what I said with detailed analysis and you cite.. Opinion? > assuming that's what you mean, since you keep using the term "RTX" and it's unclear what you talk about, whether it's ray tracing or DLSS etc. I use the term the same way NVIDIA uses it. RTX is anything an RTX core accelerates. Still confused? I think that might have been the intention of their marketing team. > very few people seem to contest that scenes where ray tracing is properly artistically used, have superior aesthetic quality This is quantifiable bs. Ray tracing as a technique is superior to rasterisation, but only with sufficient flops. And the current generation of hardware does not yield that critical number. So we get 'ray tracing', but so subdued and limited that existing approaches just flat out look better and also perform better. [VIDEO] Or if you want a more approachable comparison of RTX vs. not-RTX. consider Minecraft+RTX[1] vs. Minecraft+PTGI[2] [1] [LINK] [2] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
rolleiflex · 2019-03 · Reference

My impression from the analyses I've seen so far is that it barely improves the visual quality, since the game designers learned to fake it so well over the last two decades, and it comes at a significant cost to frame rate. In particular, good ray-tracing with acceptable noise levels comes at around 500 rays a point. RTX cards are capable of 2 rays a point. Here is a comparison of the regular global illumination vs RTX real-time raytracing, particularly take look at noise levels generated by RTX in the background. [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by Gamers Nexus, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources