HackerTube.dev

GitHub Copilot CRUSHES Leetcode Interview Questions! 😳

DevOps Directive · 266.5K views · 2021-07-04 · 9:20

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

A DevOps YouTuber tests GitHub Copilot on a range of Leetcode problems and finds it solves most immediately, with a few needing tweaks and some far off. He concludes it would outperform him in a FAANG-style interview.

On Hacker News

Cited as evidence that AI can solve interview-style algorithm puzzles, in threads questioning the value of Leetcode.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2021–2022

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

usrbinbash · 2022-01 · Reference

> But if there wasn't any art to these problems, then after 400+ problems wouldn't you have figured out the robotic algorithm to solve them? [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
thomasahle · 2021-12 · Reference

It's a question of whether copilot can be "creative". I'm mit sure, but it did manage to solve some of the harder leetcode questions here [VIDEO] and I'm curious how it will fare on the later advent of code problems.

Read the original HN comment ↗
MichaelMoser123 · 2021-07 · Reference

i actually like it that copilot is better than me at solving interview questions. [VIDEO] I for one welcome our robot overlords. i wonder if they could retrain the model on BSD or MIT licensed code only; How much of the open source code is licensed as GPL vs more permissive licenses, does anyone know? Interesting that they want to charge for the use of co-pilot, I guess that we will see this business model more in the future.

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by DevOps Directive, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Matches the configured criteria
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources