HackerTube.dev

Flyboard® Air Test 1

ZAPATA · 8.9M views · 2016-04-09 · 2:25

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Promotional video from Zapata Racing showing Franky Zapata flying the Flyboard Air prototype, claiming autonomous flight to 10,000 feet, 150 km/h top speed and 10 minutes of endurance.

On Hacker News

Cited in threads on personal flight and hoverboards as evidence that jet-powered personal flight devices really exist.

Discussed on HN; no positive recommendation is recorded in this export · HN mentions 2016–2017

Topics

Aviation & aerospace engineeringEngineering & making (other)
Search by tags
flyboard airjet propulsionhoverboardzapataprototype

What people said

J-dawg · 2017-03 · Reference

The "Flyboard Air" is also interesting [0] (and almost definitely not a hoax!). The inventor was recently in the news [1] saying he would have to leave France because the aviation authorities were cracking down and limiting his ability to test the craft. [0] [VIDEO] [1] [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
Animats · 2016-10 · Reference

Moller makes the same claims over and over, and adjusts the proposed completion date on the web site year after year to be about three years in the future. (Long discussion of this on the Wikipedia talk page.) He's been in trouble with the SEC for overclaiming to investors. His product has been "real soon now" since the 1970s. Here's his 1974 brochure.[1] Full-scale production was to begin by the end of 1976. Moller was trying to build a VTOL powered by Wankel engines. His company was trying to build Wankels with much better power to weight ratios than usual. As usual, this resulted in much reduced engine lifespan. (Classic tradeoff, as everybody in drag racing knows.) He's been able to build a vehicle that can get off the ground, and hover a bit, tethered from a crane, for 2-3 minutes. Pure-thrust VTOL is quite possible with jet engines. The aircraft that do it, such as the Harrier and the F-35, are fighters, which are mostly engine anyway. It can be done, but not at low cost or high payload or high efficiency. Jet engines remain expensive. Despite many attempts, small, cheap, reliable jet engines remain out of reach. Below 6-passenger bizjet size, reliable engines don't seem to get much cheaper. There are cheap high-powered small jet engines with model aircraft levels of reliability and a life of 100 hours or so. That's how the Flyboard Air does it.[2] Not being stupid, they always fly this over water at low altitudes. [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
claar · 2016-06 · Reference

Looks like a nice competition: Jetpack Aviation JB-9/JB-10 (from this article): [LINK] * Specs from [LINK] : - Up to 10,000+ feet - Top speed > 100mph (>160kph) - Max flight time: 10+ minutes Flyboard Air: [VIDEO] * Specs from [LINK] : - Up to 10,000 feet - Top speed of 93.2 mph (150 km/h) - Max flight time: 10 minutes

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by ZAPATA, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources