HackerTube.dev

CppCon 2017: Kate Gregory “10 Core Guidelines You Need to Start Using Now”

CppCon · 143.8K views · 2017-10-17 · 1:02:33

Open on YouTube ↗

If playback is restricted in your region, try opening the original video. Use Mark watched to add it to your marked videos.

Overview

Kate Gregory's CppCon 2017 talk picks ten highlights from the C++ Core Guidelines and shows examples and benefits for each. It is aimed at C++ developers of any experience level who have not read the full guidelines.

On Hacker News

Recommended as the condensed tl;dr of the C++ Core Guidelines and as a route into modern C++.

Recommended by 2 HN people across 1 months · HN mentions 2017–2019

Topics

Search by tags

What people said

pjmlp · 2018-03 · Recommendation

- Tour of C++ ( [LINK] ) - Principles and Practice Using C++ ( [LINK] ) - From Mathematics to Generic Programming ( [LINK] ) - The Scott Meyers books Some of the Bjarne Stroustrup videos, "Learning and Teaching Modern C++" - [LINK] Some of the Herb Sutter videos, "Writing Good C++14... By Default" - [LINK] "Back to the Basics! Essentials of Modern C++ Style" - [LINK] Some of the Kate Gregory videos, "Stop Teaching C" - [LINK] "10 Core Guidelines You Need to Start Using Now" - [VIDEO] "It's Complicated" - [LINK]

Read the original HN comment ↗
boltzmannbrain · 2018-03 · Recommendation

I recommend the tl;dr version from Kate Gregory at CppCon 2017, “10 Core Guidelines You Need to Start Using Now”: [VIDEO]

Read the original HN comment ↗
wyldfire · 2019-07 · Reference

In fact, Sutter (et al) are working on lifetimes in CppCoreGuidelines [1]. I built their clang tree and tried it out without bothering to RTFM and tried out the warning on a pile of C++ code. I naively assumed that it might be a generally-useful warning ("-Wlifetime") that's not ready to be introduced upstream. That's not the case AFAICT. What I suppose I would've learned from RTFM is that the profile specified by the guidelines is sorta like an opt-in 'dialect' to annotate/specify lifetime information. Without it, there's lots of spurious findings. Either that, or the codebase I tried it on isn't as good as I thought it was. Here's a couple of interesting examples of failure modes -Wlifetime can detect on godbolt[2][3]. I watched a video [5] a while back on the Guidelines Support Library (GSL) [4] and it seemed like a really interesting concept. I think it's a valuable idea and I'd love to see popular C++ projects leveraging it. I'm a card-carrying RESF member† (but have a day job w/mostly C++). Don't RIIR for one thing, RIIR to get all the things. Cargo is the sleeper hit of Rust. Hygienic macros and more! [1] [LINK] [2] [LINK] [3] [LINK] [4] [LINK] [5] CppCon 2017: Kate Gregory “10 Core Guidelines You Need to Start Using Now” [VIDEO] † Rust Evangelism Strike Force -- maybe we really should have cards

Read the original HN comment ↗

Sources

Video by CppCon, played through YouTube.

Data and selection notes

HN summaries and labels may contain AI errors. HN dates refer to discussions, not video publication.

HN Library: HackerTube export (2026-10-31) and open-index/hacker-news. Upstream summaries and classifications may contain AI errors.

Views, duration and playback status refresh separately from the published catalog. When an update fails, existing data remains visible.

Selection checks
  • SaaS & AI candidates: Topic keywords do not match
  • Editor-approved picks: Editorial review is required

Rule matches identify candidates. They do not guarantee video quality or financial results.

About the library and its sources